Skip to main content
CLOSE

Charities

Close

Corporate and Commercial

Close

Employment and Immigration

Close

Fraud and Investigations

Close

Individuals

Close

Litigation

Close

Planning, Infrastructure and Regeneration

Close

Public Law

Close

Real Estate

Close

Restructuring and Insolvency

Close

Energy

Close

Entrepreneurs

Close

Private Wealth

Close

Real Estate

Close

Tech and Innovation

Close

Transport and Infrastructure

Close
Home / News and Insights / Blogs / Employment Law / 212: Employers only required to carry-over four weeks’ holiday for sickness absence

The European Court of Justice (ECJ) has ruled in two joined Finnish cases that European member states can limit the carry-over of holiday for workers on sickness absence to the four weeks’ entitlement under the Working Time Directive (WTD).

This decision concerns two separate claims brought under Finnish law. They both related to claimants who had taken a period of sickness absence and wanted to carry forward holiday entitlement exceeding the WTD entitlement which was due to them. The Finnish Labour Court referred the cases to the ECJ to determine whether the carry-over of holiday due to sickness absence applied only to the minimum four weeks’ holiday entitlement provided by the WTD, or whether it also applied to additional leave provided under domestic law or collective agreements.

The ECJ has now confirmed that where Member States provide additional holiday in addition to the four weeks’ minimum entitlement under EU law, this is governed by national law rather than the WTD. The WTD does not preclude rules in domestic legislation or collective agreements preventing the carry-over of any additional holiday entitlement. Member States are therefore free to decide the conditions relating to carry-over of enhanced leave in the event of sickness absence.

This decision provides welcome confirmation of the Employment Appeal Tribunal’s (EAT) decision in Sood Enterprises Limited v Healy where the EAT held that the WTD did not require carry-over of the 1.6 weeks’ additional leave granted under the Working Time Regulations 1998 if a worker was unable to take this leave as a result of sickness absence. Many employers will already follow this approach by limiting carry-over of the additional 1.6 weeks’ leave in cases of sickness absence, unless a relevant agreement provides otherwise. This may be a good time to review any contractual arrangements which allow non-WTD holiday to be carried over in these circumstances.

Related Articles

Our Offices

London
One Bartholomew Close
London
EC1A 7BL

Cambridge
50/60 Station Road
Cambridge
CB1 2JH

Reading
The Anchorage, 34 Bridge Street
Reading RG1 2LU

Southampton
4 Grosvenor Square
Southampton SO15 2BE

 

Reading
The Anchorage, 34 Bridge Street
Reading RG1 2LU

Southampton
4 Grosvenor Square
Southampton SO15 2BE

  • Lexcel
  • CYBER ESSENTIALS PLUS

© BDB Pitmans 2024. One Bartholomew Close, London EC1A 7BL - T +44 (0)345 222 9222

Our Services

Charities chevron
Corporate and Commercial chevron
Employment and Immigration chevron
Fraud and Investigations chevron
Individuals chevron
Litigation chevron
Planning, Infrastructure and Regeneration chevron
Public Law chevron
Real Estate chevron
Restructuring and Insolvency chevron

Sectors and Groups

Private Wealth chevron
Real Estate chevron
Transport and Infrastructure chevron