Skip to main content
CLOSE

Charities

Close

Corporate and Commercial

Close

Employment and Immigration

Close

Fraud and Investigations

Close

Individuals

Close

Litigation

Close

Planning, Infrastructure and Regeneration

Close

Public Law

Close

Real Estate

Close

Restructuring and Insolvency

Close

Energy

Close

Entrepreneurs

Close

Private Wealth

Close

Real Estate

Close

Tech and Innovation

Close

Transport and Infrastructure

Close
Home / News and Insights / Blogs / Employment Law / 297: Constructive Dismissal: EAT rules raising a grievance does not amount to affirmation of contract

An employee who waits too long before resigning after an employer has breached their contract of employment may be taken to have affirmed their contract, thereby losing the right to claim constructive dismissal. In the recent case of Gordon v J & D Pierce (Contracts) Ltd, the Employment Appeal Tribunal (EAT) considered whether an employee had affirmed his contract by engaging in the employer’s grievance procedure.

Mr Gordon raised a grievance in relation to alleged bullying by his manager and disagreements over disciplinary issues. He subsequently resigned and claimed unfair constructive dismissal on the grounds that his employer had breached the implied duty of trust and confidence, relying on the incidents that were the subject of his grievance.

The Employment Tribunal held that there was no fundamental breach of contract by the company allowing Mr Gordon to treat himself as constructively dismissed. It also held that in any event, by lodging a grievance, Mr Gordon had waived the potential breaches and affirmed his contract of employment. By continuing to seek internal resolution of the dispute, he had missed his chance to claim constructive dismissal claim. Mr Gordon appealed.

Mr Gordon’s appeal was rejected on several grounds but the point of interest in this case is the EAT’s ruling that Mr Gordon had not affirmed his contract simply by engaging in the grievance process. A contract can be terminated for some purposes, but not others. Even where an employee believes that their contract of employment is terminated, any provisions relating to the resolution of disputes can therefore continue.

The EAT’s judgment means that grievance or appeal procedures can be treated as severable from the rest of the employment contract and can continue even if the rest of the contract is terminated. This is an important point for employees, since it means that they can resign and claim constructive dismissal whilst still attempting to resolve the dispute through the grievance procedure. Hopefully this will also mean that more cases are resolved without resorting to legal action.

Related Articles

Our Offices

London
One Bartholomew Close
London
EC1A 7BL

Cambridge
50/60 Station Road
Cambridge
CB1 2JH

Reading
The Anchorage, 34 Bridge Street
Reading RG1 2LU

Southampton
4 Grosvenor Square
Southampton SO15 2BE

 

Reading
The Anchorage, 34 Bridge Street
Reading RG1 2LU

Southampton
4 Grosvenor Square
Southampton SO15 2BE

  • Lexcel
  • CYBER ESSENTIALS PLUS

© BDB Pitmans 2024. One Bartholomew Close, London EC1A 7BL - T +44 (0)345 222 9222

Our Services

Charities chevron
Corporate and Commercial chevron
Employment and Immigration chevron
Fraud and Investigations chevron
Individuals chevron
Litigation chevron
Planning, Infrastructure and Regeneration chevron
Public Law chevron
Real Estate chevron
Restructuring and Insolvency chevron

Sectors and Groups

Private Wealth chevron
Real Estate chevron
Transport and Infrastructure chevron