Skip to main content
CLOSE

Charities

Close

Corporate and Commercial

Close

Employment and Immigration

Close

Environmental, Social, and Corporate Governance

Close

Fraud and Investigations

Close

Individuals

Close

Litigation

Close

Planning, Infrastructure and Regeneration

Close

Public Law

Close

Real Estate

Close

Restructuring and Insolvency

Close

Energy

Close

Entrepreneurs

Close

Private Wealth

Close

Real Estate

Close

Tech and Innovation

Close

Transport and Infrastructure

Close
Home / News and Insights / Blogs / Employment Law / 93: Employment Appeal Tribunal rules that parity of terms for agency workers must be assessed using term-by-term approach

Under the Agency Workers’ Regulations 2010 (AWR), agency workers are entitled to the ‘same basic working and employment conditions’ as permanent employees after
12 continuous weeks (regulation 5(1)).

This only applies to terms and conditions relating to pay, duration of working time, night work, rest periods, rest breaks and annual leave (regulation 6(1)). In Kocur v Angard Staffing Solutions Ltd, the Employment Appeal Tribunal (EAT) has clarified that compliance with this provision must be assessed by looking at each term individually rather than at the worker’s overall package.

Angard Staffing Solutions supplied temporary agency workers, including Mr Kocur, to Royal Mail, where they worked alongside permanent employees. Both employees and agency workers had a daily one hour rest break, but employees were paid for the full hour whilst agency workers were only paid for 30 minutes of it. In addition, employees received 30.5 days’ annual leave, whereas agency workers received only 28 days. However, agency workers were paid an enhanced hourly rate of £10.50 per hour whilst permanent employees received £9.60.
Mr Kocur brought a claim in the Employment Tribunal alleging that under the AWR he was entitled to the same weekly working hours, annual leave and paid rest breaks as Royal Mail’s permanent employees.

The Employment Tribunal dismissed Mr Kocur’s claim, ruling that his enhanced hourly pay compensated for his less generous rest break and annual leave entitlements. His claim for parity of working hours was also rejected because this would undermine the flexibility needed by hirers when engaging agency workers to meet fluctuating demand.

On appeal, the EAT agreed with the Tribunal’s reasoning on working hours but allowed Mr Kocur’s appeal in relation to annual leave and rest breaks. The EAT held that basic working and employment conditions for agency workers must be ‘at least’ the same as those that would apply if they had been recruited directly. Failure to provide the same entitlement to annual leave and rest breaks cannot therefore be offset with a higher rate of pay. Although this means that a term-by-term approach is required, the mechanism by which parity is achieved can differ as long as the payment mechanism is transparent. For example, agency workers can receive the same holiday entitlement as permanent staff, but be paid differently, such as a higher hourly rate with a rolled-up amount for holiday pay. However, the precise allocation would have to be made clear in the worker’s payslip, which was not the case for Mr Kocur.

As well as settling the debate on whether the AWR require a term-by-term approach or whether a package approach is permissible, this case also confirms that higher rates of pay cannot be used as justification for giving agency workers less generous basic working and employment conditions. Employers are therefore advised to review and amend policies and practices accordingly.

Related Articles

Our Offices

London
One Bartholomew Close
London
EC1A 7BL

Cambridge
50/60 Station Road
Cambridge
CB1 2JH

Reading
The Anchorage, 34 Bridge Street
Reading RG1 2LU

Southampton
4 Grosvenor Square
Southampton SO15 2BE

 

Reading
The Anchorage, 34 Bridge Street
Reading RG1 2LU

Southampton
4 Grosvenor Square
Southampton SO15 2BE

  • Lexcel
  • CYBER ESSENTIALS PLUS

© BDB Pitmans 2024. One Bartholomew Close, London EC1A 7BL - T +44 (0)345 222 9222

Our Services

Charities chevron
Corporate and Commercial chevron
Employment and Immigration chevron
Environmental, Social, and Corporate Governance chevron
Fraud and Investigations chevron
Individuals chevron
Litigation chevron
Planning, Infrastructure and Regeneration chevron
Public Law chevron
Real Estate chevron
Restructuring and Insolvency chevron

Sectors and Groups

Private Wealth chevron
Real Estate chevron
Transport and Infrastructure chevron