Skip to main content
CLOSE

Charities

Close

Corporate and Commercial

Close

Employment and Immigration

Close

Fraud and Investigations

Close

Individuals

Close

Litigation

Close

Planning, Infrastructure and Regeneration

Close

Public Law

Close

Real Estate

Close

Restructuring and Insolvency

Close

Energy

Close

Entrepreneurs

Close

Private Wealth

Close

Real Estate

Close

Tech and Innovation

Close

Transport and Infrastructure

Close
Home / News and Insights / Blogs / Employment Law / 94: Employment Appeal Tribunal rules that employee with ‘pre-cancerous lesion’ had a deemed disability

Under the Equality Act 2010, employees who have been diagnosed with cancer are deemed to be disabled and therefore do not have to satisfy the usual definition of disability. In Lofty v Hamis (t/a First Café), the Employment Appeal Tribunal (EAT) held that an employee who had a ‘pre-cancerous’ skin lesion was deemed to be disabled.

Mrs Lofty was dismissed following absences from work, at least some of which related to treatment for lentigo melanoma, a type of melanoma, as well as associated health issues. She brought a claim for disability discrimination on the basis that she had a deemed disability.

The Employment Tribunal held that Mrs Lofty was not disabled because her skin condition was described as ‘pre-cancerous’ and non-invasive, meaning that it could not amount to cancer. However, on appeal, the EAT overturned this decision, finding that the Tribunal had ignored medical evidence which had clarified that the term ‘pre-cancer’ is medical shorthand for a particular stage in the development of skin cancer; it does not mean that there is no cancer. The EAT also noted that Parliament had chosen not to differentiate between different types of cancer in the Equality Act, such as invasive or non-invasive. Mrs Lofty had an ‘in situ’ melanoma, the early stages of skin cancer where cancer cells were present in the top layer of skin. The EAT therefore substituted a finding that she was disabled.

This case highlights the risks in failing to look beyond terminology and assuming that a condition described as ‘pre-cancerous’ is not cancer. Although it was clear in this case that pre-cancer is a type of skin cancer, the EAT also noted that the meaning of ‘pre-cancerous’ will vary depending on where the cells are located. This means that obtaining expert medical advice will be crucial when seeking to establish whether an employee with a pre-cancerous condition has a deemed disability for the purposes of the Equality Act.

Related Articles

Our Offices

London
One Bartholomew Close
London
EC1A 7BL

Cambridge
50/60 Station Road
Cambridge
CB1 2JH

Reading
The Anchorage, 34 Bridge Street
Reading RG1 2LU

Southampton
4 Grosvenor Square
Southampton SO15 2BE

 

Reading
The Anchorage, 34 Bridge Street
Reading RG1 2LU

Southampton
4 Grosvenor Square
Southampton SO15 2BE

  • Lexcel
  • CYBER ESSENTIALS PLUS

© BDB Pitmans 2024. One Bartholomew Close, London EC1A 7BL - T +44 (0)345 222 9222

Our Services

Charities chevron
Corporate and Commercial chevron
Employment and Immigration chevron
Fraud and Investigations chevron
Individuals chevron
Litigation chevron
Planning, Infrastructure and Regeneration chevron
Public Law chevron
Real Estate chevron
Restructuring and Insolvency chevron

Sectors and Groups

Private Wealth chevron
Real Estate chevron
Transport and Infrastructure chevron