Skip to main content
CLOSE

Charities

Close

Corporate and Commercial

Close

Employment and Immigration

Close

Fraud and Investigations

Close

Individuals

Close

Litigation

Close

Planning, Infrastructure and Regeneration

Close

Public Law

Close

Real Estate

Close

Restructuring and Insolvency

Close

Energy

Close

Entrepreneurs

Close

Private Wealth

Close

Real Estate

Close

Tech and Innovation

Close

Transport and Infrastructure

Close
Home / News and Insights / Blogs / Planning Act 2008 / 813: The Planning Act 2008 is 10

Today’s entry reports on 10 years of the Planning Act 2008.

The Planning Act 2008 received royal assent on 26 November 2008, exactly 10 years ago today. Time to take stock!

  • Applications made: 107, including six that were made twice. The hundredth, if you include the double attempts, was the North Wales Connection. If you don’t include them, applications have been made for 101 projects and the 100th was the Cleve Hill solar park last week.
  • Development Consent Orders (DCOs) granted: 68
  • Live applications: 24 (the most for over three years)
  • Applications not accepted for examination or withdrawn during acceptance: 7
  • Applications withdrawn after acceptance: 4
  • Applications not granted development consent: 4

Getting accepted for examination has been more difficult than getting granted at the end, it would seem.

For your delectation here are links to all 68 DCOs in existence, in the order they were made:

Heysham to M6 and Silvertown get the prizes for the longest and shortest names, respectively.

68 is not nearly as many as one might have expected 10 years ago, but things are picking up. I have previously opined on whether the regime has worked – spoiler alert: it has delivered consents efficiently but not as many projects are being built at all or as quickly as might have been hoped.

As the regime has matured, the focus has rightly moved from achieving consents to delivering projects, and I do think this needs some work. The ability to change a DCO mid-stream and post-consent, and the scope for doing so, as well as the scope for deciding what can be left until later for approval and how that should be achieved, all need to be made clearer.

All in all, though, it’s been quite a time, and I hope you’ve enjoyed reading this blog for 9 1/2 of those 10 years.

Related Articles

Our Offices

London
One Bartholomew Close
London
EC1A 7BL

Cambridge
50/60 Station Road
Cambridge
CB1 2JH

Reading
The Anchorage, 34 Bridge Street
Reading RG1 2LU

Southampton
4 Grosvenor Square
Southampton SO15 2BE

 

Reading
The Anchorage, 34 Bridge Street
Reading RG1 2LU

Southampton
4 Grosvenor Square
Southampton SO15 2BE

  • Lexcel
  • CYBER ESSENTIALS PLUS

© BDB Pitmans 2024. One Bartholomew Close, London EC1A 7BL - T +44 (0)345 222 9222

Our Services

Charities chevron
Corporate and Commercial chevron
Employment and Immigration chevron
Fraud and Investigations chevron
Individuals chevron
Litigation chevron
Planning, Infrastructure and Regeneration chevron
Public Law chevron
Real Estate chevron
Restructuring and Insolvency chevron

Sectors and Groups

Private Wealth chevron
Real Estate chevron
Transport and Infrastructure chevron