Skip to main content
CLOSE

Charities

Close

Corporate and Commercial

Close

Employment and Immigration

Close

Fraud and Investigations

Close

Individuals

Close

Litigation

Close

Planning, Infrastructure and Regeneration

Close

Public Law

Close

Real Estate

Close

Restructuring and Insolvency

Close

Energy

Close

Entrepreneurs

Close

Private Wealth

Close

Real Estate

Close

Tech and Innovation

Close

Transport and Infrastructure

Close
Home / News and Insights / Blogs / Public Affairs / 213: The post Brexit future is all about engagement

A joint blog with Kajsa Stenstrom, Managing Partner at Stenstrom Consulting, a leading independent Brussels public affairs consultancy

With key decisions about Brexit looming, many have focused on the personalities and political implications. They should instead be thinking about their future communications and political engagement. UK organisations need to think about Brussels and EU organisations need to think about Westminster.

In the general vacuum that has been the Brexit negotiation process, the media has had to fill the gap with politicians on all sides only too willing to provide comment. The Government has now at least published its White Paper on the future relationship with the EU but that is far from the last word. Politicians and commentators will pour over the document, and the EU negotiators have still to have their say.

But critically Brexit will mean more political engagement in Westminster and Brussels, not less.

For UK organisations, Brussels will still be vitally important. Engagement will have to increase because whatever the final nature of the Brexit deal, there will be areas of legislation and regulation that they will be impacted by and, hence, have views on.  Yes, the UK may be able to vary its own national rules but it is highly likely that we will converge to European rules over which the UK has no direct say or input. So the positions of UK businesses and others will need to be stated and heard.

It will be up to UK businesses to engage and lobby in Brussels as well as in the Member States if they are to have any sway. If it is anything to go by, it is a well known fact that Norwegian associations and regional representations spend a great deal of effort and resources on their Brussels representation and lobbying activities. Engagement for UK interests, in this scenario, just got a lot more complicated and a lot more important. There is no guarantee that the UK government, or civil servants, will have either the inclination or the resources to undertake such detailed engagement. For many UK businesses their international alliances, trade body membership and the development of alliances will become a more important part of their operations. To complicate things further, some of these trade body memberships will be called into question as UK companies will, in some instances, be stripped of certain rights; they will have to revert to a mere observer membership rather than full membership.

There could also, for UK-based business, be the potential issue of having to comply with two different sets of regulations (domestic vs EU), choosing to simply adopt the highest standards or not sell into certain markets, presumably the ones with higher regulatory requirements.  This approach is more complicated, risky and costly.

But there will be new ways of engaging as well. A UK firm simply making its voice heard in the classical way is likely to be ignored or, even worse, treated as an arrogant attempt to have our cake and eat it… So there will have to be new strategies for UK organisations. It will be a steep learning curve when attitudes and processes will have changed. It will be a new Brussels environment.

But EU-based organisations also need to think about what they are doing as well. In a future UK securing trade deals and actively seeking inward investment, EU based firms could face a very different trading environment. For those with operations already in the UK engagement may be more familiar but for potential new entrants they are going to have to work directly with Westminster and Whitehall. The Brussels channel will no longer work the way it has done.

There could well be new relationships with the devolved countries as well as they alter their roles and relationships, not just with Westminster but with Brussels as well.

Under the current working arrangements in Westminster and Brussels, organisations can engage through working groups, trade bodies, representative and membership organisations, and directly themselves. Post-Brexit, organisations will need to think afresh about their relationships, the channels they work through and the messages they deliver.

Conclusion

It is no exaggeration to say that Brexit will change everything. Whilst the new arrangements have still to be worked out, change is the only thing that is certain. Organisations need to start planning now for how they deal with Westminster and Brussels, and how they manage potentially conflicting audiences.

Related Articles

Our Offices

London
One Bartholomew Close
London
EC1A 7BL

Cambridge
50/60 Station Road
Cambridge
CB1 2JH

Reading
The Anchorage, 34 Bridge Street
Reading RG1 2LU

Southampton
Grosvenor House, Grosvenor Square
Southampton SO15 2BE

 

Reading
The Anchorage, 34 Bridge Street
Reading RG1 2LU

Southampton
Grosvenor House, Grosvenor Square
Southampton SO15 2BE

  • Lexcel
  • CYBER ESSENTIALS PLUS

© BDB Pitmans 2024. One Bartholomew Close, London EC1A 7BL - T +44 (0)345 222 9222

Our Services

Charities chevron
Corporate and Commercial chevron
Employment and Immigration chevron
Fraud and Investigations chevron
Individuals chevron
Litigation chevron
Planning, Infrastructure and Regeneration chevron
Public Law chevron
Real Estate chevron
Restructuring and Insolvency chevron

Sectors and Groups

Private Wealth chevron
Real Estate chevron
Transport and Infrastructure chevron