Skip to main content
CLOSE

Charities

Close

Corporate and Commercial

Close

Employment and Immigration

Close

Fraud and Investigations

Close

Individuals

Close

Litigation

Close

Planning, Infrastructure and Regeneration

Close

Public Law

Close

Real Estate

Close

Restructuring and Insolvency

Close

Energy

Close

Entrepreneurs

Close

Private Wealth

Close

Real Estate

Close

Tech and Innovation

Close

Transport and Infrastructure

Close
Home / News and Insights / Blogs / Real Estate / 215: Full repairing covenant required removal of asbestos at Swansea Dock

Pullman Foods Ltd v Welsh Ministers and another [2020]

The tenant, Pullman Foods Ltd, occupied a parcel of land at Swansea Dock under a 42 year lease. The landlord, Welsh Ministers, served a notice to terminate the lease without granting a new tenancy at the end of the term. No new tenancy was sought by the tenant and the lease subsequently ended and the property was vacated.

The landlord had written to the tenant requesting the removal of any buildings on the property by the end of the term and all damage to be made good under the terms of the lease. The tenant removed part of the buildings but failed to remove the remains of the buildings which contained asbestos.

The lease contained an obligation on the tenant to:

‘Deliver up the demised premises leaving the same in good and substantial repair and condition to the satisfaction of the Landlord’.

The landlord argued that the tenant had breached the repairing covenant in the lease as they had not fully removed the buildings and had failed to leave the property in good and substantial repair and condition.

The court held that the use of the word ‘condition’ in this covenant shows that the obligation was capable of extending to doing works that went beyond strict repair. The presence of asbestos at the property meant that it was in a damaged or deteriorated condition and therefore was not left in a good condition as required by the covenant.

The tenant’s parent company, BFS Group Limited, was granted licences to enter the property and remove the asbestos and the remains of the buildings. The parent company failed to remove all of the asbestos. As a result, the contamination spread across the wider site and required extensive, costly remediation works. The landlord argued that the parent company was liable for the costs of remediation under the terms of the licences.

The court held that the parent company was liable for the full costs of remediation of the property and the tenant was liable for damages resulting from the breach of the repairing covenant.

This case demonstrates the importance of tenants carrying out environmental searches as part of their due diligence prior to entering into a lease. Tenants also need to be aware that the use of the word ‘condition’ in repair and yield up covenants may place a higher standard of repair on the tenant.

Related Articles

Our Offices

London
One Bartholomew Close
London
EC1A 7BL

Cambridge
50/60 Station Road
Cambridge
CB1 2JH

Reading
The Anchorage, 34 Bridge Street
Reading RG1 2LU

Southampton
Grosvenor House, Grosvenor Square
Southampton SO15 2BE

 

Reading
The Anchorage, 34 Bridge Street
Reading RG1 2LU

Southampton
Grosvenor House, Grosvenor Square
Southampton SO15 2BE

  • Lexcel
  • CYBER ESSENTIALS PLUS

© BDB Pitmans 2024. One Bartholomew Close, London EC1A 7BL - T +44 (0)345 222 9222

Our Services

Charities chevron
Corporate and Commercial chevron
Employment and Immigration chevron
Fraud and Investigations chevron
Individuals chevron
Litigation chevron
Planning, Infrastructure and Regeneration chevron
Public Law chevron
Real Estate chevron
Restructuring and Insolvency chevron

Sectors and Groups

Private Wealth chevron
Real Estate chevron
Transport and Infrastructure chevron