Skip to main content
CLOSE

Charities

Close

Corporate and Commercial

Close

Employment and Immigration

Close

Fraud and Investigations

Close

Individuals

Close

Litigation

Close

Planning, Infrastructure and Regeneration

Close

Public Law

Close

Real Estate

Close

Restructuring and Insolvency

Close

Energy

Close

Entrepreneurs

Close

Private Wealth

Close

Real Estate

Close

Tech and Innovation

Close

Transport and Infrastructure

Close
Home / News and Insights / Case Studies / R (on the application of Lancashire County Council) v Secretary of State for Environment, Food & Rural Affairs & Janine Bebbington: R (on the application of NHS Property Services Ltd) v Surrey County Council & Timothy Jones (2018)

Why is it important?

Confirms whether land held by a public body for a statutory purpose can also be registered as a town / village green.

What happened?

The Court of Appeal considered appeals against decisions concerning the registration of land as a town / village green under section 15 of the Commons Act 2006:

  1. Lancashire County Council (LCC) applied for judicial review of a decision by the Secretary of State for Environment, Food and Rural Affairs to grant an application to register land as a town / village green. The LCC argued that the land was held for educational purposes and its registration as a town / village green would be incompatible with that statutory purpose.
  2. NHS Property Services Limited applied for judicial review of a decision by Surrey County Council to register land as a town / village green, on the ground that the land had always been held for purposes relating to healthcare and its registration as a town / village green would be incompatible with that statutory purpose.

What did the court say?

In both cases, there was no statutory incompatibility.

  1. In the first appeal, there was no statutory obligation to use the land in a particular way and the LCC would still be able to carry out its statutory educational functions if the public had the right to use the land for recreational purposes as a town / village green.
  2. In the second appeal, there was no statutory obligation to provide a hospital / healthcare facility on the land. There was no inherent inconsistency between the provisions in the statutory regime under which the land was held and the statutory provisions for registration as a village green.

Take away

For statutory incompatibility to defeat the registration of land as a town / village green there has to be an inherent inconsistency between the statutory purpose for which the land is held and its use for public recreation.

Related Articles

Our Offices

London
One Bartholomew Close
London
EC1A 7BL

Cambridge
50/60 Station Road
Cambridge
CB1 2JH

Reading
The Anchorage, 34 Bridge Street
Reading RG1 2LU

Southampton
4 Grosvenor Square
Southampton SO15 2BE

 

Reading
The Anchorage, 34 Bridge Street
Reading RG1 2LU

Southampton
4 Grosvenor Square
Southampton SO15 2BE

  • Lexcel
  • CYBER ESSENTIALS PLUS

© BDB Pitmans 2024. One Bartholomew Close, London EC1A 7BL - T +44 (0)345 222 9222

Our Services

Charities chevron
Corporate and Commercial chevron
Employment and Immigration chevron
Fraud and Investigations chevron
Individuals chevron
Litigation chevron
Planning, Infrastructure and Regeneration chevron
Public Law chevron
Real Estate chevron
Restructuring and Insolvency chevron

Sectors and Groups

Private Wealth chevron
Real Estate chevron
Transport and Infrastructure chevron