Skip to main content
CLOSE

Charities

Close

Corporate and Commercial

Close

Employment and Immigration

Close

Fraud and Investigations

Close

Individuals

Close

Litigation

Close

Planning, Infrastructure and Regeneration

Close

Public Law

Close

Real Estate

Close

Restructuring and Insolvency

Close

Energy

Close

Entrepreneurs

Close

Private Wealth

Close

Real Estate

Close

Tech and Innovation

Close

Transport and Infrastructure

Close
Home / News and Insights / Insights / Can I create a transfer of a going concern to minimise my VAT liability?

If VAT would otherwise be payable on the purchase of a commercial property, it is possible, if the property is subject to a lease at the time of purchase, to ensure that no VAT is payable on the purchase price. This can be achieved by ensuring that the transaction is a transfer of a going concern (TOGC) for VAT purposes.

By ensuring the transaction is a TOGC, this will create a VAT saving on the purchase, assuming VAT would otherwise be charged. This saving may only be cashflow if all VAT incurred could be recovered from HM Revenue & Customs (HMRC) but, it will create a real saving, namely a saving of stamp duty land tax (SDLT) which would have been payable on the VAT if charged. SDLT would be payable on any VAT charged regardless of whether the VAT itself can be recovered from HMRC.

The TOGC conditions are not particularly onerous but where taxpayers do sometimes fall foul of these is on the requirement for there to be a business in place at the time of the transfer. This is especially the case where the business that is sought to be transferred is a property letting business. Due to the savings that can be achieved on a TOGC, purchasers do, on occasion, seek to engineer the transfer of a property letting business. This typically involves putting in place lease arrangements as part of the sale so that the property acquired is let by the seller prior to the sale of it. HMRC have challenged some of these arrangements as artificial and have refused to accept that they can constitute TOGCs. In recent tribunal cases these challenges have been successful as the judges have refused to accept that the sellers have had genuine, independent letting arrangements with the tenants prior to the sales of the relevant property. Purchasers have then been left with having to pay the VAT, the SDLT on the VAT and on occasion, interest, and penalties.

If a property is to transfer as a letting business and a TOGC, it is important that the seller has a genuine, independent arrangement with the tenant. Arrangements where the tenant is introduced by the buyer to the seller with the letting agreement being substantively part of the sale arrangements are likely to be attacked by HMRC and on recent experience, successfully so. If you have any queries on the VAT status of your property purchase, our tax team are happy to assist you.

Related Articles

Our Offices

London
One Bartholomew Close
London
EC1A 7BL

Cambridge
50/60 Station Road
Cambridge
CB1 2JH

Reading
The Anchorage, 34 Bridge Street
Reading RG1 2LU

Southampton
4 Grosvenor Square
Southampton SO15 2BE

 

Reading
The Anchorage, 34 Bridge Street
Reading RG1 2LU

Southampton
4 Grosvenor Square
Southampton SO15 2BE

  • Lexcel
  • CYBER ESSENTIALS PLUS

© BDB Pitmans 2024. One Bartholomew Close, London EC1A 7BL - T +44 (0)345 222 9222

Our Services

Charities chevron
Corporate and Commercial chevron
Employment and Immigration chevron
Fraud and Investigations chevron
Individuals chevron
Litigation chevron
Planning, Infrastructure and Regeneration chevron
Public Law chevron
Real Estate chevron
Restructuring and Insolvency chevron

Sectors and Groups

Private Wealth chevron
Real Estate chevron
Transport and Infrastructure chevron