Skip to main content
CLOSE

Charities

Close

Corporate and Commercial

Close

Employment and Immigration

Close

Environmental, Social, and Corporate Governance

Close

Fraud and Investigations

Close

Individuals

Close

Litigation

Close

Planning, Infrastructure and Regeneration

Close

Public Law

Close

Real Estate

Close

Restructuring and Insolvency

Close

Energy

Close

Entrepreneurs

Close

Private Wealth

Close

Real Estate

Close

Tech and Innovation

Close

Transport and Infrastructure

Close
Home / News and Insights / Insights / Government statement on Supreme Court’s decision not to allow appeal in judges’ and firefighters’ pensions cases

On 27 June 2019, the Supreme Court denied the government permission to appeal the Court of Appeal’s judgment that the transitional provisions in judges’ and firefighters’ pension schemes were age discriminatory. The cases will now be remitted to the Employment Tribunal to determine remedy. In the meantime, the government has issued a written statement in parliament on the consequences of this decision.

These cases date from cost-saving reforms following the 2011 Hutton Report. The government implemented a number of changes across public sector pension schemes in 2015, including moving from a final salary basis to a career average revalued earnings basis. Transitional provisions applied to protect the rights of all those who were within 10 years of their normal pension age (NPA) on 1 April 2012, who were permitted to remain members of their old schemes. Tapered protection applied to those with 10 to 14 years to go until NPA and members who were more than 14 years from NPA had no protection and were transferred into new schemes offering less generous benefits. The government argued that the protected period was necessary to allow those closest to retirement more time to make adjustments to their financial planning and to maintain consistency across the public sector.

The Court of Appeal ruled that the transitional provisions in the judges’ and firefighters’ pension schemes were age discriminatory because younger members were being treated less favourably and the government had failed to show that it was pursuing any legitimate aim. In fact, those closest to retirement were least affected by the changes because benefits already accrued under the old schemes for past service were protected for all. The Supreme Court refused permission to appeal because the government could not demonstrate that it had an arguable point of law. This means that the case will now return to the Employment Tribunal to determine the remedies for the 6,200 members.

The government’s written statement dated 15 July 2019 confirms its view that, since transitional protection was offered to members of all the main public service pension schemes, the difference in treatment will now need to be remedied across all of those schemes. In addition to the judges’ and firefighters’ schemes, this will include the NHS, civil service, local government, teachers, police and armed forces schemes.

Initial estimates suggest that remedying the discrimination will increase scheme liabilities by approximately £4 billion per year since 2015.

Related Articles

Our Offices

London
One Bartholomew Close
London
EC1A 7BL

Cambridge
50/60 Station Road
Cambridge
CB1 2JH

Reading
The Anchorage, 34 Bridge Street
Reading RG1 2LU

Southampton
4 Grosvenor Square
Southampton SO15 2BE

 

Reading
The Anchorage, 34 Bridge Street
Reading RG1 2LU

Southampton
4 Grosvenor Square
Southampton SO15 2BE

  • Lexcel
  • CYBER ESSENTIALS PLUS

© BDB Pitmans 2024. One Bartholomew Close, London EC1A 7BL - T +44 (0)345 222 9222

Our Services

Charities chevron
Corporate and Commercial chevron
Employment and Immigration chevron
Environmental, Social, and Corporate Governance chevron
Fraud and Investigations chevron
Individuals chevron
Litigation chevron
Planning, Infrastructure and Regeneration chevron
Public Law chevron
Real Estate chevron
Restructuring and Insolvency chevron

Sectors and Groups

Private Wealth chevron
Real Estate chevron
Transport and Infrastructure chevron