Skip to main content
CLOSE

Charities

Close

Corporate and Commercial

Close

Employment and Immigration

Close

Fraud and Investigations

Close

Individuals

Close

Litigation

Close

Planning, Infrastructure and Regeneration

Close

Public Law

Close

Real Estate

Close

Restructuring and Insolvency

Close

Energy

Close

Entrepreneurs

Close

Private Wealth

Close

Real Estate

Close

Tech and Innovation

Close

Transport and Infrastructure

Close
Home / News and Insights / Insights / Lawyer Blames ChatGPT For Fake Citations In Court Filing

In this news story, a lawyer, Steven Schwartz, utilized ChatGPT, an artificial intelligence tool, to prepare a court filing for his client. However, he discovered that the tool had a tendency to fabricate information. Several cases he presented as evidence were found to be invented by ChatGPT, leading to a sanctions hearing. The judge overseeing the case acknowledged the unprecedented circumstance, highlighting the bogus citations and internal quotes present in the submitted cases.

This incident sheds light on the challenges and risks associated with the use of AI tools in the legal profession. While AI technologies have the potential to assist lawyers in research and document preparation, the reliance on AI-generated content necessitates caution and verification processes to ensure accuracy and reliability.

In the broader context of the tech industry, this story underscores the ongoing trends, challenges, and opportunities in AI development. The incident highlights the need for improvements in AI models, particularly in terms of generating trustworthy and accurate information. Developers must address issues related to false or misleading content, ensuring that AI systems can produce reliable results consistently.

Additionally, this incident draws attention to the ethical considerations surrounding AI usage. Legal professionals, like Schwartz, need to exercise responsibility and due diligence when incorporating AI tools into their work. Ethical practices require a thorough understanding of AI limitations, as well as the implementation of verification mechanisms to maintain the integrity of legal proceedings.

Looking ahead, the short-term industry forecast may involve increased scrutiny and regulation of AI tools in the legal sector. Authorities and professional bodies may establish guidelines and verification protocols to mitigate the risks associated with AI-generated content. Stricter regulations could ensure that legal professionals employ AI technologies responsibly and with necessary precautions.

In the long term, the incident may drive the development of specialized AI tools tailored to the legal profession. These tools could integrate advanced algorithms for fact-checking, verification, and citation analysis to minimize the potential for fabrications and inaccuracies. Legal professionals will likely need to adapt to these technologies, acquiring the skills and knowledge to effectively utilize AI tools while maintaining critical thinking and judgment.

The story’s impact extends beyond the legal industry, serving as a broader reminder of the challenges and responsibilities associated with AI adoption in various sectors. It emphasizes the importance of transparency, accountability, and continuous improvement in AI systems to foster trust among users.

In conclusion, the incident involving ChatGPT in the legal profession highlights the challenges of relying solely on AI-generated content and the need for verification processes. It reinforces the significance of ethical considerations and responsible implementation of AI tools. By addressing these challenges and focusing on improvements, the legal industry and other sectors can harness the potential of AI while upholding integrity, ethics, and accountability.

AI-generated

Time to come clean… in a first for BDB Pitmans, the above article was produced in full by ChatGPT.  We instructed the artificial intelligence tool to begin by summarising the story before considering it in the context of the tech industry and its trends, challenges, and opportunities. The above response is what ChatGPT came back with, word for word.

This article was first published in Tech+, a newsletter from our tech and innovation team designed to help readers unpack complex topics in the tech space and keep up-to-date with the changes across this rapidly evolving sector. Be the first to receive the next edition and subscribe here.

Related Articles

Our Offices

London
One Bartholomew Close
London
EC1A 7BL

Cambridge
50/60 Station Road
Cambridge
CB1 2JH

Reading
The Anchorage, 34 Bridge Street
Reading RG1 2LU

Southampton
4 Grosvenor Square
Southampton SO15 2BE

 

Reading
The Anchorage, 34 Bridge Street
Reading RG1 2LU

Southampton
4 Grosvenor Square
Southampton SO15 2BE

  • Lexcel
  • CYBER ESSENTIALS PLUS

© BDB Pitmans 2024. One Bartholomew Close, London EC1A 7BL - T +44 (0)345 222 9222

Our Services

Charities chevron
Corporate and Commercial chevron
Employment and Immigration chevron
Fraud and Investigations chevron
Individuals chevron
Litigation chevron
Planning, Infrastructure and Regeneration chevron
Public Law chevron
Real Estate chevron
Restructuring and Insolvency chevron

Sectors and Groups

Private Wealth chevron
Real Estate chevron
Transport and Infrastructure chevron