Skip to main content
CLOSE

Charities

Close

Corporate and Commercial

Close

Employment and Immigration

Close

Fraud and Investigations

Close

Individuals

Close

Litigation

Close

Planning, Infrastructure and Regeneration

Close

Public Law

Close

Real Estate

Close

Restructuring and Insolvency

Close

Energy

Close

Entrepreneurs

Close

Private Wealth

Close

Real Estate

Close

Tech and Innovation

Close

Transport and Infrastructure

Close
Home / News and Insights / Insights / Safeway v Newton: EU prohibition on levelling down applies even where scheme allowed retrospective reduction of benefits during the Barber window

The Advocate General has published an opinion in Safeway Ltd v Newton and another, which concludes that normal pension age (NPA) could not be levelled down retrospectively from the date of an earlier announcement to members, even if a power in the scheme’s rules allowed this.

This is the latest development on equalisation stemming from the landmark ECJ decision in Barber v Guardian Royal Exchange Assurance Group on 17 May 1990.

Safeway’s pension scheme had an NPA of 65 for men and 60 for women. In September 1991 an announcement was sent to members notifying them that NPA would be equalised at 65 for service after 1 December 1991. A confirmatory announcement was sent to members on 1 December 1991 and the scheme was administered on the basis that benefits were equalised on that date. The formal deed of amendment altering the NPA was not entered into until 2 May 1996, although the scheme’s amendment power allowed amendments to be made retrospectively, with effect from the date of an earlier announcement to members. It should be noted that the facts of this case pre-date section 67 of the Pensions Act 1995.

Safeway argued that the scheme’s NPA had been equalised on 1 December 1991, the date of the announcement to members. The Court of Appeal agreed with the High Court that the scheme could not be amended until the formal amending deed was executed on 2 May 1996, as the scheme’s amendment power required amendments to be made by deed. Whilst the High Court ruled that retrospective levelling down (ie increasing the NPA to the less favourable basis) breached EU law, the Court of Appeal was uncertain and referred this question to the Court of Justice of the EU (CJEU).

The Advocate General concluded that EU law prohibiting retrospective levelling down applies even where, under domestic law, this is permitted by a power in the scheme rules. This would mean that Safeway could not rely on the scheme’s power of amendment to reduce members’ benefits retrospectively from the December 1991 announcement until May 1996 when the scheme was formally amended by deed.

The CJEU’s decision is awaited. Whilst the CJEU usually follows the Advocate General’s opinion, it is not binding. If the CJEU reaches the same decision, the cost to Safeway’s scheme is likely to amount to over £100 million. However, the decision will have limited wider impact, as it will only be relevant to schemes with a similar retrospective power of amendment and which sought to equalise retrospectively before 6 April 1997, when section 67 of the Pensions Act 1995 came into force.

Related Articles

Our Offices

London
One Bartholomew Close
London
EC1A 7BL

Cambridge
50/60 Station Road
Cambridge
CB1 2JH

Reading
The Anchorage, 34 Bridge Street
Reading RG1 2LU

Southampton
Grosvenor House, Grosvenor Square
Southampton SO15 2BE

 

Reading
The Anchorage, 34 Bridge Street
Reading RG1 2LU

Southampton
Grosvenor House, Grosvenor Square
Southampton SO15 2BE

  • Lexcel
  • CYBER ESSENTIALS PLUS

© BDB Pitmans 2024. One Bartholomew Close, London EC1A 7BL - T +44 (0)345 222 9222

Our Services

Charities chevron
Corporate and Commercial chevron
Employment and Immigration chevron
Fraud and Investigations chevron
Individuals chevron
Litigation chevron
Planning, Infrastructure and Regeneration chevron
Public Law chevron
Real Estate chevron
Restructuring and Insolvency chevron

Sectors and Groups

Private Wealth chevron
Real Estate chevron
Transport and Infrastructure chevron