Skip to main content
CLOSE

Charities

Close

Corporate and Commercial

Close

Employment and Immigration

Close

Environmental, Social, and Corporate Governance

Close

Fraud and Investigations

Close

Individuals

Close

Litigation

Close

Planning and Infrastructure

Close

Public Law

Close

Real Estate

Close

Restructuring and Insolvency

Close

Energy

Close

Entrepreneurs

Close

Private Wealth

Close

Real Estate

Close

Tech and Innovation

Close

Transport

Close

31 October 2024

261: Lease forfeited for breach of user clause by dentist carrying out Botox treatments

In Bijlani v Medical Express (London) Ltd [2024], the High Court considered whether a dentist carrying out Botox procedures was in breach of a permitted user clause in the lease for a Harley Street dental practice.

This case offers useful guidance on the court’s approach to forfeiture for breaches other than for non-payment of rent and when to allow the tenant relief from forfeiture.

The Facts

The Judgment

Permitted User clause

It was held that the use of the premises by the tenant performing Botox treatments (or any dental treatments whilst her GDC registration was suspended) was in breach of the permitted user clause.

The fact that cosmetic Botox treatments can be carried out by unregistered people, as well as by a registered dentist was not relevant in this case; the wording of the permitted user clause was such that the premises could not be used at all by a person who was not a registered dental practitioner.

Waiver of forfeiture?

Dr Bijlani argued that the landlord had continued to accept rent until January 2022, after it had become aware of her suspension and that she was continuing to provide Botox from the premises, therefore waiving its right to forfeit the lease.

The Judge pointed out that, where a breach of covenant is waived, the waiver extends only to that breach and does not operate as a general waiver of the breach of covenant. The notices served on the tenant requiring a remedy of the breach of covenant were issued in February and May 2022, and there was no further acceptance of rent.

The Judge ruled that the landlord had not waived his right to forfeit in respect of these continuing breaches of the terms of the lease.

Relief from forfeiture

The Judge held that, as it had genuinely not been clear to the Dr Bijlani that the user clause prevented her from carrying out Botox treatments, there was no wilful breach of the terms of the lease. Further, there was no clear evidence of reputational damage to the landlord, nor damage to the goodwill of the building, which had both been argued by the landlord.

In the circumstances, the Judge granted relief from forfeiture, whilst imposing conditions to prevent the Dr Bijlani’s future breach of the user clause; she was unable to use the premises at all until her suspension was lifted.

Conclusions

This case shows that covenants in a lease will be interpreted by considering the purpose of the contract and the circumstances in which it was made. It was clearly intended by the parties that the premises in Harley Street should be used in accordance with maintaining the highest standards for the benefit of the landlord’s own business within the building and that of the other tenants.

A right to forfeit in a commercial lease is security for the performance of a covenant and, if the landlord can be put in the same position as before the breach occurred, relief should be granted.

share on

Latest articles

Our Offices

London
One Bartholomew Close
London
EC1A 7BL

Cambridge
20 Station Road
Cambridge
CB1 2JD

Reading
The Anchorage, 34 Bridge Street
Reading RG1 2LU

Southampton
4 Grosvenor Square
Southampton SO15 2BE

 

Reading
The Anchorage, 34 Bridge Street
Reading RG1 2LU

Southampton
4 Grosvenor Square
Southampton SO15 2BE

  • Lexcel
  • CYBER ESSENTIALS PLUS

 

BDB Pitmans is launching Broadfield soon

______________________________



To read more about our plans, click here.

© BDB Pitmans 2024. One Bartholomew Close, London EC1A 7BL - T +44 (0)345 222 9222

Our Services

Charities chevron
Corporate and Commercial chevron
Employment and Immigration chevron
Environmental, Social, and Corporate Governance chevron
Fraud and Investigations chevron
Individuals chevron
Litigation chevron
Planning and Infrastructure chevron
Public Law chevron
Real Estate chevron
Restructuring and Insolvency chevron

Sectors and Groups

Private Wealth chevron
Transport chevron