Skip to main content
CLOSE

Charities

Close

Corporate and Commercial

Close

Employment and Immigration

Close

Environmental, Social, and Corporate Governance

Close

Fraud and Investigations

Close

Individuals

Close

Litigation

Close

Planning and Infrastructure

Close

Public Law

Close

Real Estate

Close

Restructuring and Insolvency

Close

Energy

Close

Entrepreneurs

Close

Private Wealth

Close

Real Estate

Close

Tech and Innovation

Close

Transport

Close

In Arvunescu v Quick Release (Automotive) Ltd, the Court of Appeal recently considered whether an employee’s claim that his ex-employer had knowingly assisted its subsidiary company to commit an act of victimisation against him came within the scope of a COT3 settlement agreement (COT3).

After Mr Arvunescu’s employment was terminated by Quick Release (Automotive) Ltd in 2014, he brought a claim of race discrimination in the Employment Tribunal. In March 2018, this was settled by a COT3 which stated that he was to receive a payment in full and final settlement of all claims ‘of any kind whatsoever, wheresoever and howsoever arising…directly or indirectly out of or in connection with the claimant’s employment with the respondent, its termination or otherwise.’

The COT3 also stated:

‘This paragraph applies to a claim even though the claimant may be unaware at the date of this agreement of the circumstances which might give rise to it or the legal basis for such a claim.’

In May 2018, Mr Arvunescu brought a victimisation claim alleging that, prior to the COT3 being signed, Quick Release had knowingly facilitated the rejection of his job application to its wholly owned German subsidiary company by failing to progress a reference request. Both the Employment Tribunal and the Employment Appeal Tribunal (EAT) ruled that the victimisation claim could not proceed because it was covered by the COT3.

The Court of Appeal dismissed Mr Arvunescu’s appeal, ruling that the new claim clearly fell within the scope of the COT3 wording. Mr Arvunescu’s victimisation claim would necessarily involve considering whether the reason for the rejection of his job application was because he had brought race discrimination proceedings against Quick Release. Although this claim did not arise ‘out of’ his former employment, it clearly arose ‘indirectly in connection’ with it and was therefore unambiguously covered by the COT3 wording. It was also clear that the COT3 had been agreed with the purpose of settling all claims existing at that date, whether or not they were known about.

This case highlights the importance of ensuring that the wording of a COT3 agreement is clear and unambiguous, covering the settlement of future claims and claims that were unknown at the date of the agreement (to the extent legally possible). It is also important to include claims that arise ‘out of’ and are ‘directly or indirectly connected to’ the previous employment or its termination. Where possible, the influence of relations with group companies to the employer should also be considered and built into the COT3 itself.

It is important to note however, that unlike COT3 agreements, ordinary settlement agreements are unable to validly waive future unknown claims. This was confirmed in the recent Scottish EAT decision of Bathgate v Technip UK Ltd where the employee’s age discrimination claim could in principle proceed because the settlement agreement had been signed before the circumstances giving rise to the claim had arisen.

If you would like any further information on the matters covered above or to find out how our Employment team can help you, please visit our webpages. You can view all our previous blog articles here.

Latest articles

Our Offices

London
One Bartholomew Close
London
EC1A 7BL

Cambridge
20 Station Road
Cambridge
CB1 2JD

Reading
The Anchorage, 34 Bridge Street
Reading RG1 2LU

Southampton
4 Grosvenor Square
Southampton SO15 2BE

 

Reading
The Anchorage, 34 Bridge Street
Reading RG1 2LU

Southampton
4 Grosvenor Square
Southampton SO15 2BE

Follow us

  • Lexcel
  • CYBER ESSENTIALS PLUS

 

BDB Pitmans has launched Broadfield and is now part of the new transformative international law firm.

Should you need to confirm our bank details, please call +44 20 7092 6996.

© BDB Pitmans 2025. One Bartholomew Close, London EC1A 7BL - T +44 (0)345 222 9222

Our Services

Charities chevron
Corporate and Commercial chevron
Employment and Immigration chevron
Environmental, Social, and Corporate Governance chevron
Fraud and Investigations chevron
Individuals chevron
Litigation chevron
Planning and Infrastructure chevron
Public Law chevron
Real Estate chevron
Restructuring and Insolvency chevron

Sectors and Groups

Private Wealth chevron
Transport chevron