Skip to main content
CLOSE

Charities

Close

Corporate and Commercial

Close

Employment and Immigration

Close

Environmental, Social, and Corporate Governance

Close

Fraud and Investigations

Close

Individuals

Close

Litigation

Close

Planning and Infrastructure

Close

Public Law

Close

Real Estate

Close

Restructuring and Insolvency

Close

Energy

Close

Entrepreneurs

Close

Private Wealth

Close

Real Estate

Close

Tech and Innovation

Close

Transport

Close

An employee may resign and claim constructive dismissal in response to a fundamental breach of their contract of employment by their employer. However, delaying too long before resigning may mean that the employee has affirmed their contract and lost the right to make a claim. In the recent case of Leaney v Loughborough Universitythe Employment Appeal Tribunal (EAT) has confirmed that it is not just the fact of delay that is relevant. All the circumstances, including the employee’s conduct, must be considered when assessing whether that delay amounts to affirmation.

Dr Leaney had worked for Loughborough University for 40 years as a lecturer and a warden in a hall of residence. He raised a grievance about the way the University had handled an incident connected with his warden role which was only partially upheld. He then pursued an appeal against the outcome of his grievance. The University failed to organise the appeal and urged him to draw a line under the matter. However, he persisted and eventually contacted solicitors who conducted negotiations with the University. No resolution could be reached, and Dr Leaney resigned, claiming that the failure of the negotiations was the last straw. He subsequently brought a claim for constructive dismissal, alleging that the University had conducted itself in a manner that amounted to a cumulative breach of the implied duty of trust and confidence.

The Employment Tribunal rejected Dr Leaney’s claim because it found that he had delayed his resignation for two months from the date when it had become clear that the University was not going to resolve his grievance. The Tribunal held that he had affirmed his contract of employment in this intervening period.

The EAT has now allowed Dr Leaney’s appeal, ruling that the Tribunal had relied too heavily on the fact of delay and had failed to examine all other potentially relevant circumstances. For example, the Tribunal had given insufficient consideration to the fact that the period of delay coincided with the University’s summer vacation; negotiations had taken place throughout that summer; and resigning after 40 years’ service could be a particularly difficult decision for Dr Leaney to weigh up. The claim was remitted to the same Tribunal so that these factors could be properly considered in assessing whether Dr Leaney had affirmed his contract prior to resigning.

This case highlights that the outcome of constructive dismissal cases will always depend on the individual facts and circumstances. The EAT has helpfully confirmed that a delay in resigning will not in itself give rise to affirmation, particularly where the employee has indicated that they are considering their position or giving the employer a chance to resolve the breach. The correct approach is to assess whether the employee’s conduct during the relevant period amounts to express or implied affirmation.

Latest articles

Our Offices

London
One Bartholomew Close
London
EC1A 7BL

Cambridge
20 Station Road
Cambridge
CB1 2JD

Reading
The Anchorage, 34 Bridge Street
Reading RG1 2LU

Southampton
4 Grosvenor Square
Southampton SO15 2BE

 

Reading
The Anchorage, 34 Bridge Street
Reading RG1 2LU

Southampton
4 Grosvenor Square
Southampton SO15 2BE

  • Lexcel
  • CYBER ESSENTIALS PLUS

 

BDB Pitmans has launched Broadfield and is now part of the new transformative international law firm.

Should you need to confirm our bank details, please call +44 20 7092 6996.

© BDB Pitmans 2024. One Bartholomew Close, London EC1A 7BL - T +44 (0)345 222 9222

Our Services

Charities chevron
Corporate and Commercial chevron
Employment and Immigration chevron
Environmental, Social, and Corporate Governance chevron
Fraud and Investigations chevron
Individuals chevron
Litigation chevron
Planning and Infrastructure chevron
Public Law chevron
Real Estate chevron
Restructuring and Insolvency chevron

Sectors and Groups

Private Wealth chevron
Transport chevron