Skip to main content
CLOSE

Charities

Close

Corporate and Commercial

Close

Employment and Immigration

Close

Environmental, Social, and Corporate Governance

Close

Fraud and Investigations

Close

Individuals

Close

Litigation

Close

Planning and Infrastructure

Close

Public Law

Close

Real Estate

Close

Restructuring and Insolvency

Close

Energy

Close

Entrepreneurs

Close

Private Wealth

Close

Real Estate

Close

Tech and Innovation

Close

Transport

Close

Where the Transfer of Undertakings (Protection of Employment) Regulations (TUPE) apply to the transfer of a business or service, all of the rights, powers, duties, and liabilities under or in connection with the contracts of employment of transferring employees are automatically transferred to the new employer. Establishing which liabilities transfer is usually reasonably straightforward. In Sean Pong Tyres Ltd v Moore, the EAT considered a more unusual situation where the alleged perpetrator in a harassment and discrimination claim transferred to the new employer under TUPE, but the claimant did not.

Mr Moore resigned from his employment with Sean Pong Tyres (SPT) and brought various Employment Tribunal claims including a claim that he had been subjected to harassment and discrimination by a colleague. His claim was brought solely against SPT. Shortly afterwards, the alleged perpetrator transferred to a new employer, Credential, under TUPE. SPT argued that liability for Mr Moore’s claims had also transferred and applied to add Credential as a party to the proceedings. The Tribunal refused SPT’s application and upheld Mr Moore’s claims.

The EAT has now confirmed the Tribunal’s decision. Liability for a claim under the Equality Act 2010 is owed to the claimant employee. In the context of a TUPE transfer, that liability arises in connection with the claimant’s contract of employment, not the perpetrator’s. Therefore, if the claimant does not transfer, as in this case, liability for a discrimination and harassment claim remains with the original employer.

The EAT distinguished this case from Doane v Wimbledon Football Club, a 2007 County Court case in which it was held that vicarious liability for an alleged negligent football tackle by a transferring player could pass to the new employer under TUPE. Doane concerned vicarious liability in tort for the negligent act of a transferring employee, but was not applicable to the type of primary liability arising under the Equality Act.

The EAT has confirmed that liability for a claim under the Equality Act 2010 does not transfer unless the claimant also transfers. This is not a surprising decision, since TUPE does not operate to transfer rights and obligations in relation to employees who are not transferring. However, it does illustrate the importance of undertaking full due diligence in order to understand which rights and obligations attach to transferring employees.

Latest articles

Our Offices

London
One Bartholomew Close
London
EC1A 7BL

Cambridge
20 Station Road
Cambridge
CB1 2JD

Reading
The Anchorage, 34 Bridge Street
Reading RG1 2LU

Southampton
4 Grosvenor Square
Southampton SO15 2BE

 

Reading
The Anchorage, 34 Bridge Street
Reading RG1 2LU

Southampton
4 Grosvenor Square
Southampton SO15 2BE

Follow us

  • Lexcel
  • CYBER ESSENTIALS PLUS

 

BDB Pitmans has launched Broadfield and is now part of the new transformative international law firm.

Should you need to confirm our bank details, please call +44 20 7092 6996.

© BDB Pitmans 2024. One Bartholomew Close, London EC1A 7BL - T +44 (0)345 222 9222

Our Services

Charities chevron
Corporate and Commercial chevron
Employment and Immigration chevron
Environmental, Social, and Corporate Governance chevron
Fraud and Investigations chevron
Individuals chevron
Litigation chevron
Planning and Infrastructure chevron
Public Law chevron
Real Estate chevron
Restructuring and Insolvency chevron

Sectors and Groups

Private Wealth chevron
Transport chevron