Skip to main content
CLOSE

Charities

Close

Corporate and Commercial

Close

Employment and Immigration

Close

Fraud and Investigations

Close

Individuals

Close

Litigation

Close

Planning, Infrastructure and Regeneration

Close

Public Law

Close

Real Estate

Close

Restructuring and Insolvency

Close

Energy

Close

Entrepreneurs

Close

Private Wealth

Close

Real Estate

Close

Tech and Innovation

Close

Transport and Infrastructure

Close
Home / News and Insights / News / British Airways wins in Court of Appeal

The Court of Appeal has found in favour of British Airways in British Airways plc v Airways Pension Scheme Trustee Ltd.

Under the scheme’s rules, pensions were increased in accordance with the Pensions Increase (Review) Orders. These were set with reference to RPI but, since 2011, have been set by reference to CPI.

In 2011, the trustees used their unilateral amendment power to give themselves a new power to grant discretionary increases. In 2013, the trustees exercised that new power to award an increase of 0.2%, which was halfway between CPI and RPI for that particular year. British Airways opposed the decision. The scheme was already in deficit and the discretionary increase would increase liabilities by about £12 million.

The majority of the Court of Appeal found that the exercise of the amendment power to introduce a discretionary increase was within the scope of the express wording of the power but that it was invalid nevertheless, as it was for an ‘improper purpose’.

The trust deed described the trustees’ role as to “manage and administer the Scheme”. The majority of the judges considered that the trustees’ purported amendment to introduce a power to award discretionary increases “resulted in a scheme with a different overall purpose” in which the trustees were “paymaster” as well as managers and administrators.

As such, the Court also found that there was no valid discretionary increase.

Whilst it is unusual for trustees to have a unilateral amendment power, the Court’s reasoning around the ‘improper purpose’ principle will have wider application. The trustees have now been given permission to appeal to the Supreme Court.

Read more about the case here.

Related Articles

Our Offices

London
One Bartholomew Close
London
EC1A 7BL

Cambridge
50/60 Station Road
Cambridge
CB1 2JH

Reading
The Anchorage, 34 Bridge Street
Reading RG1 2LU

Southampton
Grosvenor House, Grosvenor Square
Southampton SO15 2BE

 

Reading
The Anchorage, 34 Bridge Street
Reading RG1 2LU

Southampton
Grosvenor House, Grosvenor Square
Southampton SO15 2BE

  • Lexcel
  • CYBER ESSENTIALS PLUS

© BDB Pitmans 2024. One Bartholomew Close, London EC1A 7BL - T +44 (0)345 222 9222

Our Services

Charities chevron
Corporate and Commercial chevron
Employment and Immigration chevron
Fraud and Investigations chevron
Individuals chevron
Litigation chevron
Planning, Infrastructure and Regeneration chevron
Public Law chevron
Real Estate chevron
Restructuring and Insolvency chevron

Sectors and Groups

Private Wealth chevron
Real Estate chevron
Transport and Infrastructure chevron