Skip to main content
CLOSE

Charities

Close

Corporate and Commercial

Close

Employment and Immigration

Close

Fraud and Investigations

Close

Individuals

Close

Litigation

Close

Planning, Infrastructure and Regeneration

Close

Public Law

Close

Real Estate

Close

Restructuring and Insolvency

Close

Energy

Close

Entrepreneurs

Close

Private Wealth

Close

Real Estate

Close

Tech and Innovation

Close

Transport and Infrastructure

Close
Home / News and Insights / News / Shake up over ‘entire agreement’ clause

A High Court Judge has shaken things up by ruling that an ‘entire agreement’ clause, which made no reference to misrepresentation, is effective nonetheless.

Courts have historically rejected attempts to construe ‘entire agreement’ clauses to exclude or limit liability for misrepresentation, unless clear words are used to that effect. Additionally, clauses which attempt to do so are subject to the reasonableness test (in business to business transactions when one party is trading on the other’s standard terms) before they can be held to be enforceable.

The Judge used the following reasoning to explain his decision:

  • The document (a share purchase agreement) obliged the seller to indemnify the buyer for losses arising from a misrepresentation of target’s liabilities (which is what the buyer what claiming for) in any event; and
  • The entire agreement wording was more widely drafted than usual, including words such as “drafts, agreements, promises, negotiations and representations”, rather than merely “representations”. This, the Judge held, distinguished it from the Axa v Campbell [2011] case, in which the opposite decision was made.

It may appear at first that ‘entire agreement’ clauses need not be quite as all-encompassing as they were before this decision. However, caution is advised: this is a decision that does not fit within the norm, and there are factors which suggest that the decision was largely based on the fact that other protections existed outside of the entire agreement clause on which the buyer could rely.

Related Articles

Our Offices

London
One Bartholomew Close
London
EC1A 7BL

Cambridge
50/60 Station Road
Cambridge
CB1 2JH

Reading
The Anchorage, 34 Bridge Street
Reading RG1 2LU

Southampton
Grosvenor House, Grosvenor Square
Southampton SO15 2BE

 

Reading
The Anchorage, 34 Bridge Street
Reading RG1 2LU

Southampton
Grosvenor House, Grosvenor Square
Southampton SO15 2BE

  • Lexcel
  • CYBER ESSENTIALS PLUS

© BDB Pitmans 2024. One Bartholomew Close, London EC1A 7BL - T +44 (0)345 222 9222

Our Services

Charities chevron
Corporate and Commercial chevron
Employment and Immigration chevron
Fraud and Investigations chevron
Individuals chevron
Litigation chevron
Planning, Infrastructure and Regeneration chevron
Public Law chevron
Real Estate chevron
Restructuring and Insolvency chevron

Sectors and Groups

Private Wealth chevron
Real Estate chevron
Transport and Infrastructure chevron