Skip to main content
CLOSE

Charities

Close

Corporate and Commercial

Close

Employment and Immigration

Close

Fraud and Investigations

Close

Individuals

Close

Litigation

Close

Planning, Infrastructure and Regeneration

Close

Public Law

Close

Real Estate

Close

Restructuring and Insolvency

Close

Energy

Close

Entrepreneurs

Close

Private Wealth

Close

Real Estate

Close

Tech and Innovation

Close

Transport and Infrastructure

Close
Home / News and Insights / Blogs / Planning Act 2008 / 850: Delay for sixth DCO decision in a row

Today’s entry reports on delays to decisions on development consent orders.​

On 16 January 2020 the decision on the Manston Airport DCO application, due on 18 January 2020, was delayed for four months via a written statement in parliament from transport minister Nusrat Ghani MP.​

That marks the sixth delay in a row for decisions on DCO applications. In a sense, Manston has fared better than the others, which have been delayed for six months in one case and ‘sine die’ (ie to an until as yet unspecified date) in the other four cases.​

The delay statements sometimes admit that the election was the cause but mostly don’t, and say that further information is required, in general not having asked for any during the three month decision period.​

While the election period clearly does mean that some work is unable to be done and decisions themselves should probably not be issued during them, especially on the larger and more controversial projects, surely consultations would be OK during that period.​

I said it before during the last (and until then – only) spate of delays during 2017-18, but certainty of timing is one of the biggest assets of the regime. The Planning Inspectorate do their bit in keeping to time on examinations and producing examining authority reports, but it is when those reports land on government departments’ desks that hold-ups are occurring, and this cannot continue for long now that the election is well and truly over.​

Both main departments have delayed applications, incidentally; of the six, three are transport projects and three are energy projects. However, there is a seventh earlier project that is also delayed, Hornsea Three, which means that the Department for Business, Energy and Industrial Strategy edges it over the Department for Transport.​

In one positive sign, the Secretary of State for Transport has asked for further information on the A63 highway project fairly early on in the three-month period, which is a hopeful sign that things are settling down.

So while the election is a genuine reason for delay, any decisions due from 12 March 2020 onward should be unaffected and we should be back on an even keel by then.

Related Articles

Our Offices

London
One Bartholomew Close
London
EC1A 7BL

Cambridge
50/60 Station Road
Cambridge
CB1 2JH

Reading
The Anchorage, 34 Bridge Street
Reading RG1 2LU

Southampton
Grosvenor House, Grosvenor Square
Southampton SO15 2BE

 

Reading
The Anchorage, 34 Bridge Street
Reading RG1 2LU

Southampton
Grosvenor House, Grosvenor Square
Southampton SO15 2BE

  • Lexcel
  • CYBER ESSENTIALS PLUS

© BDB Pitmans 2024. One Bartholomew Close, London EC1A 7BL - T +44 (0)345 222 9222

Our Services

Charities chevron
Corporate and Commercial chevron
Employment and Immigration chevron
Fraud and Investigations chevron
Individuals chevron
Litigation chevron
Planning, Infrastructure and Regeneration chevron
Public Law chevron
Real Estate chevron
Restructuring and Insolvency chevron

Sectors and Groups

Private Wealth chevron
Real Estate chevron
Transport and Infrastructure chevron