Skip to main content
CLOSE

Charities

Close

Corporate and Commercial

Close

Employment and Immigration

Close

Environmental, Social, and Corporate Governance

Close

Fraud and Investigations

Close

Individuals

Close

Litigation

Close

Planning, Infrastructure and Regeneration

Close

Public Law

Close

Real Estate

Close

Restructuring and Insolvency

Close

Energy

Close

Entrepreneurs

Close

Private Wealth

Close

Real Estate

Close

Tech and Innovation

Close

Transport and Infrastructure

Close
Home / News and Insights / News / Pitmans acts in landmark jurisdiction case

The question of whether an individual who is employed by a British employer but lives and works abroad can bring employment claims under British employment legislation has been recently considered by the Court of Appeal in the case of The British Council -v- David Jeffery [2018].

Mr Jeffery was employed by the British Council but lived and worked in Bangladesh where he ran an English language teaching centre.

Following his resignation which concerned the proposed closing of the teaching centre, Mr Jeffery brought proceedings against the British Council in the Employment Tribunal in London complaining of unfair dismissal, whistleblower detriment and discrimination on grounds of religion or belief. Pitmans was instructed to act on behalf of Mr Jeffery in this matter. As part of its defence the British Council argued that the London Employment Tribunal had no jurisdiction to entertain Mr Jeffery’s claims because he was working outside the UK.

In general terms, an individual who lives and works in a particular foreign country, even if they are British and employed by a British company, will be subject to the relevant employment law provisions of that particular country rather than English law unless their case is exceptional and there are specifically strong factors to indicate that their employment is sufficiently connected with Great Britain.

The Court of Appeal concluded that there were enough factors in Mr Jeffery’s case to sufficiently connect his employment with Great Britain including the fact that Mr Jeffery’s contract of employment was governed by the laws of England and Wales and his salary was payable in sterling. He was entitled to membership of the Civil Service Pension Scheme and his employment was pensionable.

The court held that, when considering where an individual’s employment is sufficiently connected with Great Britain, an Employment Tribunal judge must carry out a “comparative exercise” and consider the factors connecting the employment with Great Britain against the factors connecting the employment with the country the employee is actually working in.

This case sets an important legal precedent for employees working for UK organisations abroad. It also provides clarity on factors which an Employment Tribunal will take into consideration when deciding if an individual who works in a foreign country, but is employed by a British employer, can bring an employment claim in the UK.

Related Articles

Our Offices

London
One Bartholomew Close
London
EC1A 7BL

Cambridge
50/60 Station Road
Cambridge
CB1 2JH

Reading
The Anchorage, 34 Bridge Street
Reading RG1 2LU

Southampton
4 Grosvenor Square
Southampton SO15 2BE

 

Reading
The Anchorage, 34 Bridge Street
Reading RG1 2LU

Southampton
4 Grosvenor Square
Southampton SO15 2BE

  • Lexcel
  • CYBER ESSENTIALS PLUS

© BDB Pitmans 2024. One Bartholomew Close, London EC1A 7BL - T +44 (0)345 222 9222

Our Services

Charities chevron
Corporate and Commercial chevron
Employment and Immigration chevron
Environmental, Social, and Corporate Governance chevron
Fraud and Investigations chevron
Individuals chevron
Litigation chevron
Planning, Infrastructure and Regeneration chevron
Public Law chevron
Real Estate chevron
Restructuring and Insolvency chevron

Sectors and Groups

Private Wealth chevron
Real Estate chevron
Transport and Infrastructure chevron