Skip to main content
CLOSE

Charities

Close

Corporate and Commercial

Close

Employment and Immigration

Close

Environmental, Social, and Corporate Governance

Close

Fraud and Investigations

Close

Individuals

Close

Litigation

Close

Planning and Infrastructure

Close

Public Law

Close

Real Estate

Close

Restructuring and Insolvency

Close

Energy

Close

Entrepreneurs

Close

Private Wealth

Close

Real Estate

Close

Tech and Innovation

Close

Transport

Close

The ordinary rule (CPR 7.5) is that the claimant issues a claim form and then has 4 months to serve it. Less often discussed is a provision which, if used in the right way, can be an effective tool for defendants and disastrous for unprepared claimants (CPR 7.7).

What is the rule in CPR 7.7?

Once a claim form has been issued, a defendant can serve a notice on the claimant, demanding that he serve the claim form or discontinue the claim within a specified period. The specified period must be at least 14 days after service of the notice under CPR 7.7.

What happens if the claimant doesn’t comply?

If a claimant fails to comply, the defendant can apply to the court to have the claim dismissed.

When might a defendant want to utilise this?

By setting an early deadline for service of the claim form, defendants can utilise CPR 7.7 to put pressure on unprepared claimants, which might result in the claimant scrambling to particularise their claim or even abandoning it (CPR 7.4 requires particulars of claim to be served within 14 days after service of the claim form). This can prove effective in cases where claimants, who do not have a strong claim, have issued proceedings to put pressure on the defendant to make a quick settlement offer. Forcing the claimant to serve the claim form and particularise their claim may ‘call their bluff’ and cause them to abandon their claim or accept a lower settlement offer.

However, this tool is not often invoked by defendants because: i) they have to be aware a claim form has been issued; ii) it can quickly advance the litigation against them; and iii) it can distract the parties from sensible and constructive commercial settlement discussions. Invoking CPR 7.7 is, therefore, a high-risk strategy. Nevertheless, defendants should always have this tool in mind when considering their options.

Please contact Laurens Zhang, Julian Prentice, or another member of our litigation team if you have any queries.

Latest articles

Our Offices

London
One Bartholomew Close
London
EC1A 7BL

Cambridge
20 Station Road
Cambridge
CB1 2JD

Reading
The Anchorage, 34 Bridge Street
Reading RG1 2LU

Southampton
4 Grosvenor Square
Southampton SO15 2BE

 

Reading
The Anchorage, 34 Bridge Street
Reading RG1 2LU

Southampton
4 Grosvenor Square
Southampton SO15 2BE

  • Lexcel
  • CYBER ESSENTIALS PLUS

 

BDB Pitmans has launched Broadfield and is now part of the new transformative international law firm.

Should you need to confirm our bank details, please call +44 20 7092 6996.

© BDB Pitmans 2024. One Bartholomew Close, London EC1A 7BL - T +44 (0)345 222 9222

Our Services

Charities chevron
Corporate and Commercial chevron
Employment and Immigration chevron
Environmental, Social, and Corporate Governance chevron
Fraud and Investigations chevron
Individuals chevron
Litigation chevron
Planning and Infrastructure chevron
Public Law chevron
Real Estate chevron
Restructuring and Insolvency chevron

Sectors and Groups

Private Wealth chevron
Transport chevron